Search

Mark M Piwowarski

from Glenelg, MD
Age ~58
Get Report
Also known as:
Mark M Pinowarski, Mark M Piwowatski, Mark I
Phone and address:
14503 Edgewoods Way, Glenelg, MD 21737
(410) 489-9864
Related to:
Dawn Vanessa Jardine, 64Alison Piwowarski, 28Christina M Piwowarski, 59
Connected to:
Aneta K Piwowarczyk, 46Barbara M Piwowarski, 55Daniel J Piwowar, 67Emilia Piwowar, 47Gerald S Piwowarczyk, 72Henryka T Piwowar, 81Kristina M Piwowarski, 41Magdalena P Piwowarczyk, 40Nicole Piwowarczyk, 44Regina Piwowar, 66

Mark Piwowarski Phones & Addresses

  • 14503 Edgewoods Way, Glenelg, MD 21737 (410) 489-9864
  • 5230 Tiyana Ct, Ellicott City, MD 21043
  • 9601 Donnan Castle Ct, Laurel, MD 20723
  • 2215 Arapahoe Ave, Catonsville, MD 21228
  • Felton, PA
  • 14503 Edgewoods Way, Glenelg, MD 21737

Resumes

Resumes

Mark Piwowarski Photo 1

Chief Executive Officer

View page
Location:
14503 Edgewoods Way, Glenelg, MD 21737
Industry:
Information Technology And Services
Work:
I7 Consulting Group
Chief Executive Officer
Strata-J Solutions, Llc
Consultant
Education:
Loyola University Maryland 1995 - 1998
Master of Business Administration, Masters, Finance The Johns Hopkins University 1993 - 1995
Master of Science, Masters, Computer Engineering Columbia University 1987 - 1991
Bachelors, Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering St. Francis High School Lake Shore, New York
Skills:
Saas
Enterprise Architecture
Program Management
Business Analysis
Software Development
Requirements Analysis
Pmp
Sdlc
Vendor Management
Education
Software Project Management
Cloud Computing
Enterprise Software
Integration
Business Intelligence
Management Consulting
Business Process Improvement
Mark Piwowarski Photo 2

Mark Piwowarski

View page

Publications

Us Patents

Selection Of A Consensus From A Plurality Of Ideas

View page
US Patent:
20080254436, Oct 16, 2008
Filed:
Nov 5, 2007
Appl. No.:
11/934990
Inventors:
Michael A. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Pat A. Fontana - Watertown NY, US
Alex M. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Ralph E. Roland - Silver Spring MD, US
Shawn M. Davis - Clarksville MD, US
Mark M. Piwowarski - Ellicott City MD, US
John P. Gaus - Watertown NY, US
International Classification:
G06F 19/00
US Classification:
434362
Abstract:
A method of forming a consensus from a collection of ideas is disclosed. The ideas may be generated by a collection of participants, or may be provided to the collection of participants. The ideas are divided into non-exclusive groups for evaluation, with each group being provided to a participant for voting. Each participant chooses a favorite idea from the group, or selects a first and second choice, or a first, second and third choice. The votes are tallied, and for each idea a “win percentage” is calculated, which is defined as the ratio of the number of groups in which a particular idea wins the voting, divided by the number of groups in which a particular idea appears. Each idea that has a “win percentage” that exceeds a particular threshold is passed on to one or more subsequent rounds of voting. If desired, the voting may continue until a single idea is chosen as the consensus. In some rounds of voting, the groups are configured so that a participant does not vote on his/her own idea. In the first round of voting, the groups are configured so that no two ideas compete against each other more than once. A formulaic template is provided for generation of the groups, based on the number of ideas, the number of participants, and the number of ideas per group. In some embodiments, the template and number of ideas per group may be formulated using the sequence of integers known as the Mian-Chowla sequence.

System And Method For Algorithmic Selection Of A Consensus From A Plurality Of Ideas

View page
US Patent:
20090239205, Sep 24, 2009
Filed:
May 28, 2009
Appl. No.:
12/473598
Inventors:
Michael A. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Alex M. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Ralph E. Roland - Ellicott City MD, US
Shawn M. Davis - Clarksville MD, US
Mark M. Piwowarski - Ellicott City MD, US
John P. Gaus - Watertown NY, US
International Classification:
G09B 7/00
US Classification:
434362
Abstract:
A system and method for algorithmic selection of a consensus from a collection of ideas is disclosed. A group of ideas is provided to a group of participants for voting. Voting may occur in a single round or in several successive rounds, optionally until a consensus idea is chosen. Typically, the votes that are cast use discrete levels, such as “approve”, “disapprove”, “positive”, “neutral” or “negative”. For ideas that receive the same votes, a differentiator may be the time spent casting the vote. A relatively long evaluation time may signal some internal conflict in the mind of the participant, when compared with a relatively short evaluation time, which may signal no such conflict. The evaluation time may be combined with the rating of the participant to form a weighted rating. Consequently, a short evaluation time of a positive rating may yield a more positive weighted rating, while a short evaluation time of a negative rating may yield a more negative weighted rating.

Selection Of A Consensus From A Plurality Of Ideas

View page
US Patent:
20130060605, Mar 7, 2013
Filed:
Sep 4, 2012
Appl. No.:
13/602978
Inventors:
Michael A. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Alex M. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Ralph E. Roland - Silver Spring MD, US
Shawn M. Davis - Clarksville MD, US
Mark M. Piwowarski - Ellicott City MD, US
John P. Gaus - Watertown NY, US
Assignee:
Watertown Software, Inc. - Watertown MN
International Classification:
G06Q 30/02
US Classification:
705 732
Abstract:
A method of forming a consensus from a collection of ideas is disclosed. The ideas are divided into non-exclusive groups for evaluation, with each group being provided to a participant for voting. The votes are tallied, and for each idea a “win percentage” is calculated, which is defined as the ratio of the number of groups in which a particular idea wins the voting, divided by the number of groups in which a particular idea appears. Each idea that has a “win percentage” that exceeds a particular threshold is passed on to one or more subsequent rounds of voting. In the first round of voting, the groups are configured so that no two ideas compete against each other more than once.

System And Method For Algorithmic Selection Of A Consensus From A Plurality Of Ideas

View page
US Patent:
20130302778, Nov 14, 2013
Filed:
Jul 22, 2013
Appl. No.:
13/947406
Inventors:
Michael A. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Alex M. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Ralph E. Roland - Silver Spring MD, US
Shawn M. Davis - Clarksville MD, US
Mark M. Piwowarski - Ellicott City MD, US
John P. Gaus - Watertown NY, US
International Classification:
G09B 7/00
US Classification:
434362
Abstract:
A system and method for algorithmic selection of a consensus from a collection of ideas is disclosed. A group of ideas is provided to a group of participants for voting. Voting may occur in a single round or in several successive rounds, optionally until a consensus idea is chosen. Typically, the votes that are cast use discrete levels, such as “approve”, “disapprove”, “positive”, “neutral” or “negative”. For ideas that receive the same votes, a differentiator may be the time spent casting the vote. A relatively long evaluation time may signal some internal conflict in the mind of the participant, when compared with a relatively short evaluation time, which may signal no such conflict. The evaluation time may be combined with the rating of the participant to form a weighted rating. Consequently, a short evaluation time of a positive rating may yield a more positive weighted rating, while a short evaluation time of a negative rating may yield a more negative weighted rating.

Selection Of A Consensus From A Plurality Of Ideas

View page
US Patent:
20180247267, Aug 30, 2018
Filed:
Apr 30, 2018
Appl. No.:
15/966781
Inventors:
Michael A. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Alex M. Morgia - Watertown NY, US
Ralph E. Roland - Silver Spring MD, US
Shawn M. Davis - Clarksville MD, US
Mark M. Piwowarski - Ellicott City MD, US
John P. Gaus - Watertown NY, US
Assignee:
Watertown Software, Inc. - Watertown MN
International Classification:
G06Q 10/10
Abstract:
A method of forming a consensus from a collection of ideas is disclosed. The ideas are divided into non-exclusive groups for evaluation, with each group being provided to a participant for voting. The votes are tallied, and for each idea a “win percentage” is calculated, which is defined as the ratio of the number of groups in which a particular idea wins the voting, divided by the number of groups in which a particular idea appears. Each idea that has a “win percentage” that exceeds a particular threshold is passed on to one or more subsequent rounds of voting. In the first round of voting, the groups are configured so that no two ideas compete against each other more than once.

System And Method For Algorithmic Selection Of A Consensus From A Plurality Of Ideas

View page
US Patent:
20150046538, Feb 12, 2015
Filed:
Oct 28, 2014
Appl. No.:
14/525701
Inventors:
- Watertown NY, US
Alex M. Morgia - Syracuse NY, US
Ralph E. Roland - Ellicott City MD, US
Shawn M. Davis - Clarksville MD, US
Mark M. Piwowarski - Glenelg MD, US
John P. Gaus - Watertown NY, US
International Classification:
H04L 29/08
US Classification:
709204
Abstract:
A system and method for algorithmic selection of a consensus from a collection of ideas is disclosed. A group of ideas is provided to a group of participants for voting. Voting may occur in a single round or in several successive rounds, optionally until a consensus idea is chosen. Typically, the votes that are cast use discrete levels, such as “approve”, “disapprove”, “positive”, “neutral” or “negative”. For ideas that receive the same votes, a differentiator may be the time spent casting the vote. A relatively long evaluation time may signal some internal conflict in the mind of the participant, when compared with a relatively short evaluation time, which may signal no such conflict. The evaluation time may be combined with the rating of the participant to form a weighted rating. Consequently, a short evaluation time of a positive rating may yield a more positive weighted rating, while a short evaluation time of a negative rating may yield a more negative weighted rating.
Control profile
Mark M Piwowarski from Glenelg, MD, age ~58 Get Report